Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #42854, same but different

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

could also do this in imap_uid_array_to_set, which is the function which
requires the data ordered.

but looks fine as is too.

On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 14:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> same fix as 42854, but for other entry points. A few of the functions I
> added sorting to probably don't need it, but it doesn't hurt and it
> ensures there aren't any issues that go unseen due to an unsorted list
> of uids.
> 
> Jeff