Re: [evolution-patches] prelude to a fix for bug #42295



ah, good point. suck :\

Jeff

On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 18:43, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 18:25, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > The attached patch is meant to the beginnings of a possible fix for bug
> > #42295.
> > 
> > assuming this is the right direction to fix this, should I add code to
> > the imap-summary to save the missing count? or do we not care?
> 
> It's not enough to have just a missing count. You need to actually keep
> a placeholder fake message in the summary somehow, or our sequence
> numbers will be out of sync with the server's and then untagged FETCH
> and EXPUNGE responses will be matched up with the wrong messages.
> 
> -- Dan
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]