Re: [evolution-patches] prelude to a fix for bug #42295

[Dan Winship <danw ximian com>]

On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 18:25, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> The attached patch is meant to the beginnings of a possible fix for bug
> #42295.
> 
> assuming this is the right direction to fix this, should I add code to
> the imap-summary to save the missing count? or do we not care?

It's not enough to have just a missing count. You need to actually keep
a placeholder fake message in the summary somehow, or our sequence
numbers will be out of sync with the server's and then untagged FETCH
and EXPUNGE responses will be matched up with the wrong messages.

-- Dan