Re: [evolution-patches] Seeking review for bug #47751 & #47752
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: William Jon McCann <mccannwj pha jhu edu>
- Cc: Maxx Cao <maxx cao sun com>, Anna Marie Dirks <anna ximian com>, Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution-patches <evolution-patches lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Seeking review for bug #47751 & #47752
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:35:10 -0400
how is "window" any better than druid or wizard? I think it's pretty
safe to say that a user knows what a wizard dialog is.
Microsoft uses them everywhere...
Jeff
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:27 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 02:15, Maxx Cao wrote:
> > 3. The confirmation message will be like this:
> > "Are you sure you want to cancel this druid?"
> > ~~~~~ (
> > or "wizard" is better wording for end users?)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just curious, is it ever really necessary to expose this kind of
> terminology to the user? I'm going to guess most people in the world
> have no idea what this kind of druid or wizard is - nor do they care
> to. We already force users to learn way too much lingo IMO.
>
> How about:
> "Are you sure you want to close this configuration window?"
> or "Do you want to cancel this configuration process?"
>
> The first still relies on the user identifying a thing (window) but at
> least one that is already entrenched and kinda/sorta has a real world
> counterpart. The second attempts to refer to what the user has been
> doing. In general I think this latter approach works better.
>
> It may also be good to add secondary text that explains that information
> that has been entered will be lost.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jon
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]