Re: [Evolution] Replying to spam

[Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam whitemice org>]

> It's the same with notes about top posting, HTML, hints to use a search
> engine before asking etc..

TOP POSTING ***SUCKS***! :)  But, seriously, it does.

> The amount of spam is low, we perhaps get more unwanted snail mail and
> don't talk about it, simply through it away.

Unwanted snail mail goes in the recycling bin, for which my city grants
points by weight when the robot collects it [the bins are bar coded],
and those points can be redeemed for free transit passes.  Junk snail
mail is virtuous!