Re: [Evolution] Sending photos from digKam: "Skipping suspicious attachment"

[Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>]

On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the
> attachments were skipped. 

You will in 3.4.  It was considered a security issue that came up during
3.3 development, so the filename blacklist was backported to 3.2 without
introducing any new translatable (read: user-visible) messages.

> And is it possible to convince Evolution that stuff in .kde is not
> suspicious?

It would have to be patched in.

Not being a KDE user, how widely is ~/.kde still used?  I thought KDE
complied with the XDG base directory specification it helped write, or
is ~/.kde a legacy directory analogous to GNOME's ~/.gnome2 ?

Matthew Barnes