[Evolution] 2.32.1 ~/.config/evolution/mail has references to ~/.evolution/mail and duplicate "On This Computer"
- From: Wayne Sierke <ws au dyndns ws>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: [Evolution] 2.32.1 ~/.config/evolution/mail has references to ~/.evolution/mail and duplicate "On This Computer"
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:49:21 +0930
FreeBSD-7.4-RELEASE i386 / Gnome/Evolution 2.32.1.
I finally got around to looking at why my automatic contacts hasn't been
working lately and noticed that the Edit/Preferences dialogs list two
"On This Computer" entries although only one "On This Computer" account
is displayed in the folders pane.
I found that in ~/.config/evolution/mail there are still references to
~/.evolution/mail:
%cd ~/.config/evolution && grep -r '[.]evolution' .
./mail/state.ini:[Store mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local]
./mail/state.ini:[Store vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Sent]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#Txx-Txxx]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Outbox]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxCxxxxx]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxxxxxCx]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Drafts]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Inbox]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#bxxxx]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#MxxxSxxxx]
./mail/state.ini:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#DxxAxxx]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-M54NFV:[Store mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-M54NFV:[Store vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-M54NFV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Sent]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-M54NFV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#Txx-Txxx]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Store mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Store vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Sent]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#Txx-Txxx]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Outbox]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxCxxxxx]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxxxxxCx]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Drafts]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Inbox]
./mail/folders/.goutputstream-R4VQLV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#bxxxx]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Store mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Store vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Sent]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#Txx-Txxx]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Outbox]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxCxxxxx]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#CxxxxxxxxCx]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Drafts]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder mbox:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/local#Inbox]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#bxxxx]
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#MxxxxSxxxx
./mail/.goutputstream-WNN9OV:[Folder vfolder:/home/ws/.evolution/mail/vfolder#DxxAxxx]
Is there a formal way to remove these entries, or is it safe to manually
remove those sections from state.ini (and .goutputstream-*)?
Is it a failure of the FreeBSD evolution port's handling of the upgrade
that has led to this?
Thanks,
Wayne
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]