Re: [Evolution] Evolution stops responding whenretrievingmessagesfrom imap.qq.com

["heyan" <heyan310 vip qq com>]

At 2010-11-14，"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2 infradead org> wrote:

>On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 09:20 +0800, heyan wrote:
>> Yeah I have tried several mail clients: Thunderbird, Kmail and
>> Sylpheed. They all works properly. So there must be some problem
>> between evolution and imap.qq.com.   
>
>Whatever mail client you *are* using is also broken -- it's not
>correctly marking your replies with the ID of the message to which
>you're replying. You are also top-posting.
>
>Assuming you're using at least Evolution 2.30 and IMAP+ (not the old
>IMAP back end), please run it from a terminal with CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx,
>capture the output and show it to me. Careful; it might include
>passwords when it logs in, so you'll want to edit those out.
>
>Note that if your reply is top-posted, I'm going to ignore it.
>
>-- 
>dwmw2
>
>_______________________________________________
>evolution-list mailing list
>evolution-list gnome org
>To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Thanks for your help. I just tried "evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx", which showed "EI: MAIL PREFS" immediately. Then nothing happened，even the evolution window did not appear. The version of Evolution is 2.30.3, and the protocol setting is confirmed to be imap+. 

iyuan yan-ubu:~$ evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx &
[1] 6161
iyuan yan-ubu:~$ EI: MAIL PREFS
iyuan yan-ubu:~$ ps aux | grep evolution
iyuan     1711  0.0  0.2 282868 10272 ?        Sl   07:54   0:00 /usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution-alarm-notify
iyuan     1732  0.0  0.2 307892  8824 ?        Sl   07:54   0:00 /usr/lib/evolution/e-calendar-factory
iyuan     1742  0.0  0.2 305880  8604 ?        Sl   07:54   0:00 /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
iyuan     6161  6.0  1.1 652824 43904 pts/1    RLl  12:10   0:01 evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx

Any suggestion? If you need, you can control my computer remotely.

BTW: Sorry I didn't know "top-posted" message is undesirable. In fact, I have never heard this word so it took me some time to guess the meaning.

rock
2010/11/15