Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:00 +1000, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> > > OK, let's summarize (RT = Reply-To address, LP = List-Post
> address,
> > > SA = Sender or From Address, CC = CC addresses):
> >
> > This all far too complicated.
>
> Agreed. If it's a user-facing change that too complicated to
> understand
> easily or explain simply, and you need to refer to a table to work out
> what the heck is going to happen, then I'm deeply opposed to it, on
> the
> basis that most ordinary users won't understand it either.

Forget the table. It was just my way of representing the possible
actions in a very explicit manner to make sure there were no ambiguities
about what we were talking about. A table showing the *current*
situation would look just as complicated.

poc