Our mail.domain is on split DNS, so resolves no matter where I am. I'm not sure what you mean about authenticating to OWA, because I thought MAPI was created so that OWA isn't needed like it was in Evolution-Exhange plugin.
>> One question is whether you are trying to access the
GAL remotely or on the same subnet? I have had no trouble on the
lan/subnet (in fact it configures itself when I authenticate to OWA in the
account setup), but haven't been >> able to get a working remote
configuration.
----Original Message-----
From: Art Alexion [mailto:art rhd org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25,
2008 3:05 PM
To: Jeff Singleton
Cc: evolution-list gnome org
Subject:
Re: [Evolution] GAL URI??
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 14:07 -0500, Jeff
Singleton wrote:
> Now that I have the functional stuff working. Now
I am testing day to
> day stuff, which includes writing/replying
e-mails. I sent one reply
> and immediately got a bounced reply
stating that the address I was
> sending too was not found in you
GAL. That is just insaned, its the
> same GAL that Outlook uses and
I don't bounced replies from there.
> So I dug a little bit, retried
replying to an email but this time I
> caught some debug
messages:
> From Evolution
--debug
>
(evolution:12655): evolution-addressbook-WARNING **:
error
> loading
addressbook : e_book_new: no factories available
for
> URI
`galldap://jsingleton shake2 airdefense net/;Global
>
Address List'
>
>
Error from Exchange
Server:
>
IMCEAEX-_O=AIRDEFENSE_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20
>
+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT
>
+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=gferguson airdefense net
>
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.ExRecipNotFound; not found ## It is
> the portion
of the error: URI
> `galldap://jsingleton shake2 airdefense net/ that the
red flags went
> up. Is galldap:// a true protocol that MAPI
can use? Not that I
> could not find anywhere on the net!! galldap:// does
not appear to be
> a viable protocol for pulling GAL data. In fact ldap://
alone will not
> work without first registering the protocol in so your
browser knows
> what to do with it..
> Can someone shed some light
on this? I can file a bug on this one but
> wanted to verify it
first.