On 23/05/2008, at 16.32, Barry D. Hassler wrote: I've given this almost a month to see if there would be any updates, but it's so bad, I've actually regressed several years, and am now depending on Outlook running on my (virtual) Windows XP system. I'm going to try building from source, but previous attempts at that were unsuccessful (or more realistically, too time consuming)
You basically have 3 options:
1) Keep using evolution-exchange
2) Wait for libmapi to complete
3) Try out evolution-brutus
-- jules
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Paul Smith < psmith gnu org> wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 22:01 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Pardon my unfamiliarity with Ubuntu, but what exactly were the
> Evolution versions that you found to be stable on 32-bit and unstable
> on 64-bit?
I've been running the latest SVN head versions on Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10
since about last August, so that's 2.21.9x and 2.22.x. I was building
my own gtkhtml, e-d-s, evolution, and evolution-exchange for a while,
then when the backward-incompatibilities in libsoup etc. came along
earlier this year I also started building glib, libsoup, and libbonobo
myself. They were/are working fine.
Ubuntu's releases are scheduled to arrive just after each Gnome release,
so Hardy contains the just-released version of Gnome and Evolution,
2.22. I'm not sure the minor version; I'll check tomorrow (the 64bit
system is at work).
--
Barry D. Hassler
President, HCST
http://www.hcst.net/
937-427-9000 _______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
|
