Re: [Evolution] EVO worked well today, but .



Hmm going back would not help either. The older Evo version just start freezing and I had to kill -9 evo and restart it. same as often. Next to it it was so extreemly slow that the standard web interface was an improvement ...Â

The 2.22.x is actually a big improvement in the UI speed and overall stability from my point of view. Of course the backend disconnects are not helping the cause. so its still better then the older version in my opinion.Â

Regards,
Axel


----- UrsprÃngliche Mail ----
Von: Art Alexion <art RHD ORG>
An: paul mad-scientist us
CC: Axel <wintera yahoo com>; Evolution <evolution-list gnome org>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 21. Mai 2008, 21:48:06 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Evolution] EVO worked well today, but .

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 09:08 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 05:36 -0700, Axel wrote:
> > Ok today was the first day for a while, that Evo worked very well in
> > the Exchange mode - no issues at all today. Very nice.
> > Yesterday I had some issues with the backend processes disconnecting
> > again, funny enough only when I went to the calendar. Now what changed
> > until today. Today there was an update, but I did not recognize any
> > Evo lib's etc ...
> >
> > Now I am wondering whether there is a dependency to a longer delay in
> > the exchange server or a specific error message, which could cause
> > Evolution to lose contact withe the backend processes. My exchange
> > server is on the other end of the world and networks delays do happen
> > of course.
>
> Most likely you're seeing this problem:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512605
>
> I know it doesn't seem the same at first glance but I've been running
> evolution-exchange-server under the debugger and this LDAP crasher shows
> up in all sorts of places; Evo is doing LDAP lookups for lots of
> different reasons.
>
> There's definitely some kind of timing component to it. I can't find a
> reliably reproducible test case, but sometimes it will happen to me 3-4
> times a day and other times not at all. For me, though, the FASTER the
> response the more likely to get a crasher. The slower my machine, or my
> network interface (it's much harder to repro from home through my VPN),
> or if I enable lots of debugging etc., it happens much less often.
>
> And, I've not seen it happen once since I started running under valgrind
> (but that's a heavy price to pay :-)).

Yeah, I was not having this problem with Gutsy/Evo 2.12.1, but was have
constant problems with Hardy/Evo 2.22.1 on the same box. So much so
that I gave up and went back to a SLED 10.1/Evo 2.6 box which almost
never disconnects.


--
Art Alexion
MIS
x3075


Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail.
Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]