Re: [Evolution] Evolution fails to see some messages in Inbox



On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 14:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 14:35 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:31 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I see no messages displayed in Inbox earlier than Sept 11, 2007,
though I know there are earlier ones.  If I search Inbox for a message
that I know is there, received in 2005, it's not found.  But if I
search the *Account*, rather than Inbox, for the same message it is
found.  

Can anyone explain this?

Sounds like this bug:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478151

Feel free to add yourself there, but the bug has not received much love
from the Evo developers.

There's a workaround there to get you your emails back, but they'll
eventually disappear again (at least, mine do).

Paul, the OP sent the identical message to the Fedora list yesterday,
and in answer to a question from me said that the Inbox is local. I
suggested he remove his cache files but he never replied to say whether
that worked or not.


I seem to be confused, or at least causing some confusion:

You wrote:
        You don't say whether the Inbox in question is local or remote.
        If it's remote, you may have a cache problem. To fix...
I replied:
        The mailbox is local.  Is there a similar plan for local
        mailboxes?
So far, I don't have a reply to this.
        Therefor I did not remove any cache files.
I also took a look at bug 478151 that you referred to.  It seems to be
about problems with evolution communicating with a server of some kind,
and to have advice about removing a folder called
         ~/.evolution.../exchange.  
My machine has no evolution server, and no such folder.  So it seemed
useful to put the email into the bug comments.

I see a note of reproach (?) if your comments.  Fedora looks like a list
to which users should go with problems or comments about any component
of Fedora.  The Evolution list and others like it are for people who
have problems that can't be solved in the general Fedora list.  Is this
correct?

Thanks to all for your help - jon





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]