> That's very true on my Ubuntu system... Thunderbird is the more stable > of the two clients. However, I put up with it. > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 12:46 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Without wanting to start a religious war, it's been my personal > > experience that Evo crashes and/or hangs a lot more than TB on the same > > platform (many versions of Fedora using KDE). Despite this, I use Evo > > nearly all the time because I'm comfortable with it (maybe that's why I > > see more problems :-) I can't be the only exception to this. I've been using Evo since it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu. In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times. My initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to suffer the most, is that the case? Admittedly, I only use Evo to check 5-7 IMAP accounts and occasionally a Groupwise account. I guess I just wanted to comment that there are cases where Evo has, and continues to be rock-solid for some users. --chris _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part