Re: [Evolution] E. does not recognise pgp signing by mutt (gpg)
- From: Guido <lists gl guido-leisker de>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] E. does not recognise pgp signing by mutt (gpg)
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:09:57 +0100
Hi List!
It seems that Evolution does not recognize, that a messages is singed,
if it is sent by mutt.
I attached two massages. Both are signed by myself and encrypted to
myself. The first is sent with evolution and the second with mutt.
The attached data is copied from mutt, for you can see which parts of
the message signed and encrypted. (That is different)
Does anybody know if this is a bug of Evolution or mutt?
First message:
http://nopaste.info/e1329ae42f.html
Second message:
http://nopaste.info/2a75cdbee5.html
I am using Evolution 2.12.1 and mutt Mutt 1.4.2.2i (2006-07-14).
But I also noticed that with prior versions of both.
I have to add: This problem raises only, when the massage is encrypted.
Massages which are only singed, are well displayed as those.
kind regards
Guido
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]