Re: [Evolution] Re: junk filtering

[Parthasarathi Susarla <sparthasarathi novell com>]

On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 18:53 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:06 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > And how about this one: It seems that the "not junk" button only can
> > > mark messages "not junk" that have been marked as "junk" previously
> > > (although it doesn't say anything like this).
> >
> > reading your message, i could use both "junk" and "not junk" button, so
> > this seems to be fixed in 2.4.2.1.
>
> The question is not whether you can use the buttons. Yes, they are
> always enabled and do "something".
>
> The problem is when you want to use it to learn ham. Apparently it was
> not designed for that, it looks like it was designed to undo a previous
> "junk"-button-press, because only then something actually happens, being
> the bayes database being updated. If you push "not junk" on a random
> message, the message doesn't get learned as "ham".

So this is a big issue, currently on HEAD, we have either the "Junk" or
the "Not Junk" button, based on wether the messages has been marked junk
or not. We actually needs to discuss this further. Am CCing Srini for
his comments on this.

Cheers,
partha