Re: [Evolution] Evolution and IMAP keywords?

[NM Public <agorae nm deflexion com>]

Sur 2006-01-31, Jean-Marc Liotier skribis:
> Also sprach NM Public [Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:27:37PM +0000] :
> > Thanks for any info about IMAP keywords in Evolution (and in any
> > other IMAP client!)
>
> I am on the same quest and I failed to find any information about IMAP
> keywords support in Evolution. Can't find anything about IMAP keywords
> support in Mutt either.
>
> By the way, thanks for your writings at Infinite Ink ! I wrote a little
> article on the subject of IMAP keywords and I found II to be a most
> inspiring ressource. My summary article about IMAP keywords :
> http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/systems/2006/01/31/breaking-out-of-single-dimension-filtering-imap-keywords

I'm happy to hear that someone else is interested in IMAP 
keywords -- thank you Jean-Marc! For now I'm sticking with 
standard IMAP flags, such as \Flagged and \Deleted, and I just 
yesterday posted about using IMAP flags in a 'MaybeSpam' mailbox. 
If anyone is interested, the post is here:

 Using a MaybeSpam Mailbox
 <http://deflexion.com/2006/01/using-maybespam-mailbox>

BTW, your blog post about 'Breaking out of single dimension 
filtering : IMAP keywords' links to an old version of the 
imapflags draft. The current version is this:

 SIEVE Email Filtering: IMAP flag Extension
 <http://www.faqs.org/ftp/pub/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-03.txt>

Any info or thoughts about IMAP flags or IMAP keywords are 
welcome!
Thanks,
 Nancy
  posted & cc'd
   (sent via gmane.comp.gnome.evolution.general)

--
 Nancy McGough ~ <http://www.ii.com> ~ <http://deflexion.com>
   IMAP, pine, procmail, data deflexion, infinity, and more
     > > >  Please keep the discussion in the group  < < <