Re: [Evolution] Deleting a whole thread
- From: Des Dougan <des DouganConsulting com>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Deleting a whole thread
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:47:14 -0800
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 11:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 23:45 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<snip>
<rant>
Of course if there was an Undo action, it wouldn't matter. Undo (at
least for deletes and moves) is sorely needed in any case IMHO. This has
been requested, repeatedly (see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207624 for an example), over
*4 years*, and no progress has been made on it. I consider this a
fundamental UI failing in Evo.
</rant>
With the diverse nature of camel providers (and given they also co-exist
on most clients and are expected to behave in a single consistent way
across themselves) - this is a high-entry barrier task. Point fully
taken on the value it adds for the user. I can tell you definitely that
is at least jumping up the priority lists - so keep your fingers
crossed :-).
Apologies for jumping in, but could you clarify what "the diverse nature
of camel providers" means? What does camel provide for Evo?
Thanks,
Des
--
Des Dougan, Principal
Dougan Consulting Group
Ph: 604-980-2848 Email: des at DouganConsulting dot com
www.DouganConsulting.com
Design - Implementation - Support
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]