Re: Gnome-Bounties - Conversations - Was [Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] proper threading headers]
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>
- To: Ow Mun Heng <Ow Mun Heng wdc com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers lists ximian com, guenther <guenther rudersport de>, evolution lists ximian com, Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- Subject: Re: Gnome-Bounties - Conversations - Was [Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] proper threading headers]
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:35:20 -0400
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:46 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 18:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
Cc'ing the Evolution list for information.
The current situation with heavily fragmented threads just is a pain to
me and makes keeping track of all the threads I'm replying to trying to
help unnecessarily difficult. Well, I vented already... ;)
Just wondering, has the evo team already had some people who's shown
interest in implementing Google's Summer of Code bounty for grouping
threads as conversations?
not that I recall
(Frankly I've not used Gmail, but I think its
conversation implementation is much like a mail-list where one's replies
to posts is also included in the conversation and not only in the sent
folder?)
I have no idea how to describe what gmail does... I guess something like
that, sure.
/me wondering only.
/me also wishes to know if Evo will only day support or divert somewhat
from the RFC and implement support for Exhange's "Thread-Index" for
threading. Since Evo is being ported to Windows(r) I guess this is a
valid question.
I don't really see what being ported to windows has to do with
Thread-Index
afaik, there's no plans to support Thread-Index altho that doesn't mean
it won't happen. I have no idea.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]