Re: [Evolution] Flushing changes back to the imap server
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Nigel Metheringham <Nigel Metheringham dev intechnology co uk>
- Cc: dsf <evolution lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Flushing changes back to the imap server
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:41:14 +0800
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 14:29 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 20:55 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> When you view another folder, the previous folder's changes are synced
> back. This is the easiest way - much easier than quitting evolution.
I guess this is where I am hitting problems - I tend to leave one window
permanently on a VFolder which shows unseen mail (excluding spam tagged
mail). The reason I do this is:-
1. It takes a long time to transition in/out of this VFolder
is that slower than losing all your message status?
2. I like to be able to see recent related messages.
3. The VFolder does not seem to pick up the threads properly when
it regenerates (I have "Include threads: All related" set on the
VFolder properties - but some messages seem to be dropping out -
maybe the messages are missing some thread headers, although I
have the subject threading gconf key set).
yeah probably a bug. changing folders will also fix this.
> I hope you're submitting bug reports for the crashes too - obviously
> it shouldn't crash!
If I can reproduce the crash. Too often any crashes seem to be a case
of "it just crashed" and so I can't put together a coherent bug report.
If you wish I can do vague bugzilla reports, but when I can't work out
what caused it to go, and am not offered bug-buddy dialog and can't see
any cores around I tend to feel they don't give you much quality
feedback :-/
Well if the stack traces are ok (i.le. there are some symbols in them), its worth submitting anyway. Sometimes (rarely, but sometimes), we can spot problems from them.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]