Re: [Evolution] spam filtering via evo with an alternate mailbox?
- From: Bram Mertens <bram-mertens linux be>
- To: evolution mailing list <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] spam filtering via evo with an alternate mailbox?
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:46:23 +0200
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 01:59, Dan Stromberg wrote:
[...]
Anyway, I set up a filter which "Pipes message to shell command"
spamassassin -e (with a hard path), and refiles the message if there's a
nonzero exit status to my "evospam" folder.
[...]
If you gets lot of mail you will probably want to start the spamd,
otherwise a new process of SA will be started for each message using a
LOT of memory. With spamd a single process uses the same amount of
memory but all futere child processes use a lot less memory.
to do this you need to:
* start spamd (I use spamd -d -c -a but you may want to look into the
other options)
* edit your filter to look like:
pipe message to shell command "spamc -c" does not return "0"
(without the quotes, I just put them here to mark the exact commands)
* test by selecting one or two message and pressing ctrl-y (apply
filters)
* make sure that this rule is triggered before any other rule that might
match this message!
HTH
Bram
--
# Mertens Bram "M8ram" <bram-mertens linux be> Linux User #349737 #
# SuSE Linux 8.2 (i586) kernel 2.4.20-4GB i686 256MB RAM #
# 4:41pm up 64 days 20:16, 7 users, load average: 0.13, 0.15, 0.12 #
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]