Am Sa, den 15.05.2004 schrieb Jeffrey Stedfast um 1:09:
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 16:06 -0500, Brian G. Peterson wrote:I'm writing to inquire after the status of inline OpenPGP support in Evolution. Google and the archive for this list (and my current experience with Evolution) seem to indicate that inline OpenPGP messages are *still* not supported. inline support is required for full OpenPGP standards compliance............. End Of Thread (since nothing useful can come out of further discussion of this topic)
I think the last sentence is a little bit rude. No matter some one was asking for a feature (that I think would be nice) and at least has read a lot of rfc which is not easy especially when the topic is mime and pgp. I know that other (M$ and Linux) mailer have this option and I think it would be nice. It is okay to decide to not implement this but it should be okay to talk about it. No matter who does the actuall encryption or singing my mailer should at least give an interface to all the usefull features of pgp. However pgp signing is working and I am using it. I guess that the signature evo creates with the help of pgp is only for the text not for attachements (kmail can do both)? Gregor -- Dipl.-Ing. Gregor Hlawacek Leoben, Austria PGP Fingerprint: 1AA0 DC5C 186F 6144 01F0 8FB2 7ABD D7FB FBCD F36E http://www.unileoben.ac.at/~hlawacek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil