Re: [Evolution] Hide IMAP dot folders? END OF THREAD



Jeff:
I went home last night and checked out my Evo where I use imap to
connect to a remote server. No dot folders actually show up.
Tom



All Tusonix outgoing e-mail has been scanned for viruses




On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
who cares what mozilla does? if mozilla jumps off a bridge, should we do
it? I don't think so.

the imap specifications (rfc2060) states that it is the SERVERS OPTION
to hide folders from a LIST "" "*" query. If the server doesn't hide
them, then the client has NO CHOICE but to assume that these are valid
mailbox folders.

dot files are PERFECTLY VALID IMAP FOLDER NAMES and thus should be
treated as such by the client.

if you have a complaint, either go complain to your imap server vendor
or to Mark Crispin <mrc washington edu>, who, funnily enough, is
probably right down the hall from mr otterson and is also responsible
for the implementation of uw.imapd (or at least the initial
implementation).

So there you have it.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 18:42, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
Scott, 
You are right, Mozilla has no such problem and doesn't show any hidden
(.) folders.
Tom


On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:39, Scott Otterson wrote:
Of course, the point is that the mail clients almost everybody is
familiar with don't require this.

It is also cumbersome, confusing, and totally unnecessary.

Scott

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 14:29, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I already told you: if you don't want to see dot files, then don't
subscribe to them. or delete them off your imap server. I don't care.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 17:03, Scott Otterson wrote:
Does the spec tell you to display an email if you click on it?  

No, but this is conventional email client behavior.  If you literally
implement only what is in the spec, I don't know what you'd have but it
is certain that nobody could use it.

Similarly, not showing dotfiles is an IMAP client convention.  People
expect it, and your client is for people, afterall.

Scott

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I invite you to read the bloody spec and show me where it says to hide
dot files. if you can't find it, then I'm not implementing it. period.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:14, Scott Otterson wrote:
If Outlook and Mozilla (>90% of all IMAP clients by user) don't display
dotfiles, then that IS the convention.

Evolution isn't following it.
 
Scott

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:02, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
if there was a convention, it would be in the server implementation -
WHERE IT BELONGS

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 14:53, Scott Otterson wrote:
Unix again...

Outlook and Mozilla -- two of the most popular non-Unix IMAP clients --
do not display dotfiles, regardless of what LIST returns.  There's a
convention here that evolution isn't following.

Scott

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 11:23, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
hiding dot files is a unix filesystem thing, it is not an imap thing.

if folders starting with a . were meant to be hidden by imap clients,
then the server simply wouldn't return them in the LIST query, now would
it?

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:28, Scott Otterson wrote:
I don't see what the OS has to do with this.

Mozilla and Outlook -- neither of which require Unix -- hide the
dotfiles.  If two of the most popular IMAP clients handle this situation
gracefully, then this is starting to look like an OS-independent IMAP
convention.

Has anybody noticed how other IMAP clients handle dotfiles?

Scott

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 10:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
imap != unix filesystem

period.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:06, Scott Otterson wrote:
Well, manually subscribing to a bunch of folders is a way to handle
this. 

But Mozilla and Outlook are smarter than that... can't evolution be too?

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 09:45, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
this is a server issue, not a client issue.

if your server uses dot files for state info, then it should not be
listing them when we query for folders.

however, you *could* simply have evo show only subscribed folders and
just not subscribe to the dot folders.

Jeff

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:21, Scott Otterson wrote:
Is there a way to set up evolution to not display IMAP status dot
folders?

The UW IMAP server I'm hooked to has a lot of folders beginning with a
period.  I never look at them because they contain account info, spam
filter status and so on.  They're invisible in the folder views of
mozilla, outlook express, etc., but they fill up the screen in
evolution.

Is there an evolution XML file somewhere that I can change?

Thanks,

Scott

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
















_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution




_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]