Re: [Evolution] Hide IMAP dot folders?

[Ted Anderson <tja pobox com>]

Trust me, guys, I've seen the secret Ximian porn site. Jeff's *IS*
bigger than [y]ours!

Can't we just all get along?

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:39, Scott Otterson wrote:
> Of course, the point is that the mail clients almost everybody is
> familiar with don't require this.
>
> It is also cumbersome, confusing, and totally unnecessary.
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 14:29, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > I already told you: if you don't want to see dot files, then don't
> > subscribe to them. or delete them off your imap server. I don't care.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 17:03, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > Does the spec tell you to display an email if you click on it?  
> > >
> > > No, but this is conventional email client behavior.  If you literally
> > > implement only what is in the spec, I don't know what you'd have but it
> > > is certain that nobody could use it.
> > >
> > > Similarly, not showing dotfiles is an IMAP client convention.  People
> > > expect it, and your client is for people, afterall.
> > >
> > > Scott