On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 20:55, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
what would be the point?
I've noticed some mailing lists reject binary attachments in what I'm assuming is some half-ass attempt at anti-virus protection. Probably blocking all multipart/* stuff. While I realize this is more an issue with the list software/config it brought about the question, so I'm asking...
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:26, Brian V Bonini wrote:Is it possible for evolution to send textmode signatures? IE: looking for this: gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1 rather then this: gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA1
--
Brian GnuPG -> KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | URL: www.gfx-design.com/keys
Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
======================================================================
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 04A4F0DC
GnuPG: http://gnupg.org
http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x2C35011004A4F0DC
Linux Registered User #339825 at http://counter.li.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part