Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.4 performance on KDE 3.1

[Bjørn T Johansen <btj havleik no>]

Of course it is working properly!!! Everything else is lightning fast, it's just gnome 2 apps and especially evolution that's really slow.....

BTJ

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 17:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> sounds like your system is incorrectly configured. This is certainly
> *not* an evolution bug if it is only reproducable on SuSE 8.2 (which
> seems to be the case based on other responses in this thread).
>
> Make sure that hardware acceleration is working properly
>
> Jeff
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 07:27, Paul Hands wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > Should I submit the following as a bug?
> > 
> > I'm running evolution 1.4.4 (and also the latest snaps - no
> > difference) on KDE 3.1 (various versions - 3.1.1, 3.1.3) on SuSE 8.2. 
> > System is a 2Ghz IBM T30 laptop with 2G RAM, Radeon mobility graphics
> > adaptor, XFree86-4.3.0-15.
> > 
> > The graphics performance is awful.  
> > 
> > Anything which causes a window redraw (without changing window sizes)
> > takes around 8 seconds to complete.  That includes changing folders -
> > something which happens a lot.  The redraw of the summary and preview
> > panes takes the most time - the folder bar needs about 3 seconds to
> > look complete.  
> > 
> > If I resize the window (main or composer)  the redraw can take up to
> > 30 seconds.  During that time, the mouse cursor is grabbed, and is
> > restricted to a screen area which seems to be the old size of the
> > window.
> > 
> > If I switch into a gnome session (gnome 2.2 as supplied with the SuSE
> > distro) instead of KDE, graphics performance is fine.
> > 
> > I don't want to start a gnome versus KDE thread here - it serves no
> > purpose.  However, I bet a lot of evolution users are on KDE as well,
> > and therefore I'd like to know..............
> > 
> > 1. Is it just me, or are other KDE users seeing this.  If so, what
> > distro etc?
> > 2. Is it restricted to Evolution, or are other gnome apps affected in
> > the same way?  
> > 
> > and of course,
> > 
> > 3. Is it worth submitting a bug?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Paul