It comes up a fair amount in a google search. It's apparently a progressive jpeg. Perhaps the distinction exists because some software groks jpeg but not progressive jpeg. The difference is a nonissue to linux users, because the jpeg library we use understands both. Why do I think microsoft has something to do with this? :) On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 12:51, Not Zed wrote:
Bloody dickheads. That's all i've got to say to that. It isn't any standard type, and is infact, merely jpeg as far as I can tell. FWIW 1.6 will treat them as images like anything else. On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 10:39, Ted Anderson wrote:Just so the people using the GMX mail service don't feel alone, apparently Yahoo is converting images to pjpeg as well. I just received some Yahoo mails with attachments, and all of the photos were pjpeg. I guess the supporters of this type of image need to get it added to the approved list.
-- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <strombrg dcs nac uci edu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part