Re: [Evolution] Inline UUencode support re-added to newest snaps
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Inline UUencode support re-added to newest snaps
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:06:07 -0400
ok, I gather people don't care about this feature... should I just remove it? :-)
j/k
Jeff
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 16:50, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
From:
|
Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
|
To:
|
evolution ximian com
|
Subject:
|
[Evolution] Inline UUencode support re-added to newest snaps
|
Date:
|
Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:50:19 -0400
|
Mailer:
|
Ximian Evolution 1.5
|
|
|
|
I just spent yesterday rewriting the uuencode support for Broken Mailers
(tm) that still haven't caught up with the rest of us who've been using
MIME since 10+ years ago.
If people could test that:
1. it doesn't crash
2. it doesn't mis-classify some text as uuencoded blobs
3. it doesn't miss any real uuencoded blobs
4. (anything else?)
that would be really helpful.
I think my patch will be in any snaps released after today's, so
tomorrows snaps should have it.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
|
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]