Re: [Evolution] spamassassin learning
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: Steve <sschaper qwest net>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] spamassassin learning
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 18:43:29 +0100
Please, leave the thread on the list unless you wanna reply to me
personally. Reply To List or Reply To All will do.
If you want us to check your filters, *post* your filter...
Good point.
spamassassin -e > /dev/null returns less than 0
Less than zero? What makes you think SPAM is reported with negative
return codes? I dunno, the documentation say:
-e, --error-code, --exit-code
Exit with a non-zero error code, if the message is determined to
be spam.
Beside that: AFAIK redirecting the output can harm the results (IIRC
Jeff said so some days ago), I may be wrong, though. And I would get rid
of the redirection part, shouldn't do anything useful at all.
Filters for SpamAssassin have been discussed some times. Likely you can
find some working filters in the archives. There is a searchable
version:
http://www.mail-archive.com/evolution%40lists.ximian.com/
HTH
...guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]