Re: [Evolution] Spamassassin less effective
- From: Philippe <phd fcomfrench com>
- To: arthur alexion com
- Cc: Evolution List <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Spamassassin less effective
- Date: 20 Jun 2003 18:26:42 +0700
Hi,
It does not not so bad to me, as I am a newbie with spamassassin and I
am using it for 2 weeks. I can say 95% of the spam get caught.
I a using spamassassin-2.55-2 rpm, maybe better than 0.50 ?
Philippe
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 13:12, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
Have others using Spamassassin noticed a drop in effectiveness?
Am using v. 2.50, spamd/spamc combo through a filter that tests for a
non-false result and, if so, moves to a spam folder. In the beginning,
I used to tune my blacklists/whitelists a lot, but after it seemed to be
most effective, I stopped.
Did something get corrupted in my config, or is it just a matter of
getting back to manually updating my blacklists?
--
Philippe, Chiangmai, Thailand
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]