Re: [Evolution] kernel 2.5 and evolution
- From: Joaquim Fellmann <mljf altern org>
- To: Ronald Kuetemeier <ronald kuetemeier com>
- Cc: Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>, Andreas Jellinghaus <aj dungeon inka de>, Evolution <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] kernel 2.5 and evolution
- Date: 06 Jan 2003 17:40:45 +0100
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:13, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
Sorry but _NO_ it's not 2.5, Gnome is broken,
you can read all about it and get a patch on the evolution-hackers list.
Wrong too.
It seems to be Orbit assuming a kernel routine to return some value but
receiving something else.
Actually it was a kernel bug (that got fixed) on which Orbit was
relying.
Problem is that Orbit didn't get fixed.
A message on the linux kernel mailing list is refering to a bitkeeper
changeset at the origin of the "evolution case". Before this changeset
Evolution is dealing right with kernel 2.5 and after this changeset it
doesn't work anymore.
See http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-41/0444.html
Regards
--
Joaquim Fellmann <mljf altern org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]