[Evolution] Re: [Users] The SMTP Problem...



On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:21, Kris Stark wrote:
More interestingly even - why did that one message cause a failure of
the entire queue?  (Obvious, as it is a queue...)  However, this should
have some sort of a system in place to allow recovery from errors such
as this...

Kris

On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote:
Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no
recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was
nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which should have
automatically brought the addresses over from the message it was a reply
to?

I thought of that, but I think for that to work might require a
different format for storing messages. Actually, that is a good
question...does Evolution use mbox or mdir format? And would one allow
for some code that would skip over bad messages while the other doesn't,
or does it really matter?

I haven't seen a single email client yet that can recover from this
error - but generally the error message will say something about the
address blocks being empty, rather than simply relaying the error
message it gets from the server.

-- 
Bill Hartwell <raven macmanusnet net>
MacManus Enterprises

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]