On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out that may have caused the problem? Jeff On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote:Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which should have automatically brought the addresses over from the message it was a reply to?
The subject was "Built-in spam filtering?" and the message number was 1041547319 12478 16 camel lostzed mmc com au I figure if you still have it in your message folders and can pull it up, it'll save a little bandwidth - and reduce the risk of something getting changed in transit. A possible solution that comes to my mind is that maybe the address got garbled or lost if it was one of those I trimmed down by deleting the ccs and copying the address I wanted to send it to from the Cc: field to the To: field. Since I have the mailing lists in my address book, they don't show up as addresses in the message editing display - instead, they show up with the IDs they have in my address book. Would cut/paste from one field to another break the link to the address book so that the ID is dereferenced? -- Bill Hartwell <raven macmanusnet net> MacManus Enterprises
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part