Re: [Evolution] about fonts again

[Michael Spurlock <mspurlock nc rr com>]

No, actually I would not be surprised.  I know exactly what it would
do.  However, I think it should still be at the user's discretion.  Who
am I to tell someone to not want ugly e-mail?  :)

On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 20:10, Not Zed wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 12:12, Michael Spurlock wrote:
> > Only text based (non-html) messages are displayed with the fixed-width
> > font.  If the message were in html, it would use the proportional font. 
> > The reason it used a fixed-width font for text is to retain formatting
> > in text files that were written and formatted to expect a fixed width
> > font.  Otherwise the message would not be formatted properly when you
> > read it.  However it would be nice if they would let us override this
> > feature and force proportional fonts for all message types and ignore
> > strict formatting rules.
>
> You'd be surprised how ugly and unreadable it makes messages ...
>
> > On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 17:34, anto ..(='·'=).. wrote:
> > > Hi again everybody!
> > > I've downloaded Red Carpet and updated to Evo 1.2.1, wich is so much
> > > better that the old version I was using...BUT I still have a stupid
> > > little problem with fonts. It seems that Evo can only use monospaced
> > > fonts to display e-mails. It's no big deal, but it woulkd be great if I
> > > could switch back to Luxi Sans. I just find it more 'readable'.
> > > Any advice?
> > > Thanx a lot and please excuse my bugging questions :o)
> > >
> > > Antonella
> > -- 
> > Michael Spurlock <mspurlock nc rr com>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
-- 
Michael Spurlock <mspurlock nc rr com>