Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.2 much slower than 1.0.8 in POP retrieval

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Well its actually a bug in the pop server, it isn't saying it supports
uidl which it should if it does, assuming it does, which i guess it
would.

Its a known issue, although i can't say when it will be fixed :-/

On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:42, Malte Erikson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:39, Dan Winship wrote:
> > > There's a known issue that many buggy pop servers support UIDL even
> > > though they say they dont, or at least, they dont say they do, which
> > > they're supposed to.
> >
> > Ah. In 1.0, if the server didn't support CAPA, Evo would try UIDL
> > anyway. Looks like it doesn't do that in 1.2. That could be why 1.2 is
> > slower for him.
>
> Dan, Not Zed!
>
> I'm expericing the same as Jeffery, also having alot of messages in the
> InBox I POP from (a Exchange 5.5 server).
>
> I fired up evolution-mail with CAMEL_DEBUG_VERBOSE active, and evo-mail
> did execute 3500 TOP commands before I'm receiving any mail. Every time
> evolution is checking for mail, it probably are executing all these TOP
> commands. Anyway, it takes about 30s each time before I'm retrieving any
> mail. This was alot faster in the 1.0.x series. Should I file a bug, or
> are you planning to do anything to fasten up the process?
>
> -- 
>  / Malte
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution