Re: [Evolution] Problem replying to all
- From: Dick Roth <raroth7 attbi com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Problem replying to all
- Date: 31 Mar 2003 19:26:46 -0500
The question then becomes: where does this get truncated? When the
identical original email is "replied to all" via Netscape 7.xx, it sails
though the post office with no trouble. Could there be a limit to the
length of the recipients list?
Thanks,
Dick
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:35, Dan Winship wrote:
from the bounce:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
553 5.0.0 "BANNER GERALD P." <ban... Unbalanced '<'
and then in the message body:
Cc: Joe Fischetti <fischetti mycompanydomain>, Paul Conroy
<conroy mycompanydomain>, "O'SHEA DANIEL F." <oshea mycompanydomain>,
"ALUSOW NANCY J." <nalusow mycompanydomain>, "PAYNE DANIEL J."
<payne mycompanydomain>, "STOKES GRANT H." <stokes mycompanydomain>,
"BANNER GERALD P." <ban>
Note the address at the end. It's missing the "@domain" part.
-- Dan
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]