Re: [Evolution] diff between "evo dev snapshot" and "ximain evo beta" channels?

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:51, Mike Godfrey wrote:
> Aha, so the beta is, presumably, more stable.  Thanks.
>
> (maybe this could be made more obvious on the channel selection
> screens.)

I'm not sure its really required.  Almost every project has the concept
of a 'nightly build' or snapshot, which is known to be bleeding edge,
and hence possibly wont even run at all.  Likewise the conventions for
beta imply a more stable near-release-ready version.

> On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 12:57, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 09:43, Mike Godfrey wrote:
> > > What's the difference between the "evo dev snapshot" channel and the
> > > "evo beta" channel?
> >
> > Snapshots are built every day from CVS, the Beta is a "blessed" release.
> >
> > -- 
> > Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
> -- 
> Michael Godfrey PhD, Assistant Professor
> Nortel Networks Jr Chair, Telecommunications Software Engineering
> Univ of Waterloo, School of Computer Science
> email:  migod uwaterloo ca 
> URL:    http://www.uwaterloo.ca/~migod
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution