Re: [Evolution] Comments on Evolution 1.2

[Nigel Metheringham <Nigel Metheringham dev InTechnology co uk>]

On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 15:22, PeterKorman wrote:
> There are 2 RFCs.
> [....]
> RFC1894 
> is for MTAs. The UA generates only the request. The MTA generates the 
> response. Dr. QMail dismisses rfc1894 as entirely obsolete. DJBernstien 
> has his own method but, AFAIK, he didn't write an RFC, so chances of a 
> standard emerging from 'The QMail Way' are somehwat difficult to 
> prognosticate. 

Frankly no one is much interested in RFC1894 - I think sendmail does at
least partially implement it (which is a shame - it legitimises it), but
the other mainstream mailers give it a wide berth.  Here's a quote from
the exim list:-
  http://www.exim.org/mailman/htdig/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-19990927/014475.html

        Nigel.
-- 
[ Nigel Metheringham           Nigel Metheringham InTechnology co uk ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]