Re: [Evolution] pgp signing and outlook

[Erik Grinaker <erikg wired-networks net>]

On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 20:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:

> There is no "small hack" that can be done.

I am sure you have vastly more insight into what you are talking about
than I do, but I read in the archives that in order to have Outlook
display pgp signed messages correctly the message must be inline. This
is against the rfc, i know, but Pine seems to support this - and if Pine
does then it should also be possible to have Evolution do it.

Using inline pgp is not recommended at all, I know, and it is a very
"dirty" way of handling this - but I really need Outlook compatibility.

And I suspect it would be a minor hack having evolution do this - but I
am sure you are pretty sick and tired of people bitching about this, so
I will leave you alone ;)

Let's just hope Microsoft gets their shit together sometime soon.

-- 

Erik Grinaker
Freelance UNIX/Linux systems consultant

"Perfection is acheived not when there is nothing more to add, but
rather when there is nothing more to take away"
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry