Re: [Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??

[Lonnie Borntreger <email borntreger com>]

Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.

Any particular reason it was branched?  Just curious since I though the
"normal" way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
development.

So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I
change the GAL and Evolution branches also?

How is gtkhtml2 related to all this?


On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 06:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
    On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 05:37, Dan Hensley wrote:
    > A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's
    > looking for gtkhtml 1.0.  However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few
    > days, and it's still at 0.16.1.  Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught
    > up yet, or is there some disconnect?
    > 
    gtkhtml has also been branched. Get the gtkhtml-1-0-branch from CVS
    
    cheers
    -- 
    Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> - <rodrigo ximian com>
    http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
-- 
TTFN,
Lonnie Borntreger

             ------      ------      ------
Our mission is to authoritatively promote timely methods of
empowerment so that we may endeavor to collaboratively supply
inexpensive opportunities to exceed customer expectations