Re: [Evolution] Attachment names with =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E1=F3=E9=ED=F1?= screwed up

sounds like we were using different definitions of "legal".

in any event, problem is solved :-)


On 29 May 2001 18:42:12 +0500, Dan Winship wrote:
2 and 3 are legal, but don't have the right semantics: if an attribute
value starts and ends with "'s, it's a quoted-string, and so
"=?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA==?=" refers to the string

actually, 2 and 3 are NOT legal.

No, they are legal, they just aren't encoded iso-8859-1 strings. 3
refers to the filename "=?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA==?=" for instance.

-- Dan

evolution maillist  -  evolution helixcode com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]