Re: [Evolution] Attachment names with =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E1=F3=E9=ED=F1?= screwed up
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: Richard Zach <zach math berkeley edu>, evolution helixcode com, notzed ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Attachment names with áóéíñ screwed up
- Date: 29 May 2001 10:22:58 -0400
sounds like we were using different definitions of "legal".
in any event, problem is solved :-)
Jeff
On 29 May 2001 18:42:12 +0500, Dan Winship wrote:
2 and 3 are legal, but don't have the right semantics: if an attribute
value starts and ends with "'s, it's a quoted-string, and so
"=?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA==?=" refers to the string
actually, 2 and 3 are NOT legal.
No, they are legal, they just aren't encoded iso-8859-1 strings. 3
refers to the filename "=?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA==?=" for instance.
-- Dan
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - evolution helixcode com
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]