Re: [Evolution] Evo 0.8 & NFS
- From: Berend De Schouwer <bds jhb ucs co za>
- To: James Ogley <ogley suse co uk>
- Cc: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 0.8 & NFS
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:56:33 +0200
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:50:44 James Ogley wrote:
| > Desktop machine is SuSE 7.0, server is SuSE 6.4, news on progress may
| > well follow (if it goes pear-shaped that is)
|
|
| Well, same as Don Duck, configure with --enable-file-locking=flock did
| the trick...
|
| Since most people using Linux in an NFS environment are likely to be NFS
| mounting from a Linux box, might it not make sense to compile with this
| option by default for the RPMs?
No. flock() doesn't actually lock the file over nfs. From the man page:
NOTES
flock(2) does not lock files over NFS. Use fcntl(2)
instead: that does work over NFS, given a sufficiently
recent version of Linux and a server which supports lock
ing.
Isn't the fix to fix your NFS server/client? Or make the NFS client
mount the server with the mount option '-nolock', which makes fcntl()
calls always succeed, in effect turning it into flock().
| --
| James Ogley, Network Manager, SuSE Linux Ltd - +44 (0) 20 8 387 4088
| @ Work: ogley suse co uk http://www.suse.co.uk
| @ Home: james rubberturnip org uk http://www.rubberturnip.org.uk
| @ Mobile: riggwelter sms genie co uk
| ICQ: 57374251 Slashdot: riggwelter (84180) asylum-mud.org: Riggwelter
| "I lift up my eyes to the hills, from where does my help come?"
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| evolution maillist - evolution helixcode com
| http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
|
Kind regards,
Berend
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]