On 22 Feb 2001 17:00:22 +0000, Joao Miguel Neves wrote:
I've configured evolution to use GPG and tested it with a message from this mailing-list. On the bottom of the message I found the following lines: This message is digitally signed but can not be proven to be authentic. gpg: Signature made Wed 21 Feb 2001 09:25:19 PM WET using DSA key ID 2982E3B6 gpg: Good signature from "Sejal Patel (Bio Mage) <sejal iname com>" gpg: cannot open /dev/tty: Device not configured Shouldn't the message say that it is authentic ? Could this be because I'm looking up on a public keyserver, instead of a private keyring ? I'm not an expert on GnuPG, so any help is accepted.
In order for a signature to be authentic to you you have to sign it in your public keyring or something like that. I've only authenticated the keys from my family and that was a while back so I don't remember the exact steps but it really isn't very difficult. -- Sejal Patel (spatel agency com) Technical Consultant Agency.com : Atlanta Visit http://eyeopener.agency.com for info on our popular workshops.
Attachment:
pgpKXvJ7kxca2.pgp
Description: PGP signature