Re: [Evolution] Re: [Galeon-user] Regular total lockups with 1.0.1 (and earlier)
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- Cc: Chris Ford <crford swbell net>, Rick Ziegler <zieglerr certco com>, Victor Putz <vputz nyx net>, galeon-user lists sourceforge net, Evolution List <evolution ximian com>, rziegler sover net
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Re: [Galeon-user] Regular total lockups with 1.0.1 (and earlier)
- Date: 20 Dec 2001 16:57:43 -0500
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 14:53, Luis Villa wrote:
In keeping with the holiday spirit, I want not to flame.
I can play the not flaming game :)
3) I'm looking for confirmation ATM, but AFAIK there is exactly one
difference between our evo packages and RH's, and that's openssl v.
libnss. So saying we can't package our own software correctly and that
RH's packaging is somehow superior is completely bogus.
Actually, our packages are built versus libnss3, we just compile it
during the evolution build and link staticly. And most of our packages
haven't gone out with pilot support enabled.
As to the couple of people with Athlons reporting problems, you might
try adding noathlon to your kernel line as the Athlon optimized memcpy()
has caused some problems with some Athlon boards.
Luis -- don't know about your laptop... have you tried running memtest86
on it?
Cheers,
Jeremy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]