Re: [Evolution] gpg-sig bad?
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Niels Heinemann <niels ortschmiede de>
- Cc: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] gpg-sig bad?
- Date: 09 Dec 2001 18:08:25 -0500
That means that the other mail clients are broken with respect to
PGP/MIME presumably...
I dunno what you can do, probably nothing.
Jeff
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 08:27, Niels Heinemann wrote:
hi, there.
i have a little problem: if i gpg-sign my mails with evolution (1.0),
other muas (sylpheed, xfmail (both with the possibility to recognize
mime/mutliparted gpg-messages)) don't verify the sig. their gpg-output
ist BAD SIG. evolution verifies the sig.
any suggestions?
niels
--
| /"\
[niels@|www.]ortschmiede.de | \ / ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign
pgp|gpg - mails preferred | X Against HTML Mail
| / \
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]