Re: [Evolution] gpg-sig bad? -> more details

hi, again.

Am Son, 2001-12-09 um 14.27 schrieb Niels Heinemann:
their gpg-output ist BAD SIG. evolution verifies the sig.
other way round works. pgp-signed messages of other muas are vrified
corectly with evolution. the mime-header (and boundary-def.) of
evolution semm to be correctly. don't know what's going on.

                             |  /"\ 
[niels@|www.]  |  \ /  ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign
 pgp|gpg - mails preferred   |   X     Against HTML Mail
                             |  / \ 

Attachment: pgpwUzEsWFaCk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]