Re: [Evolution] LDAP support

Ok, see:

And scroll down to (well i'll paste it here):

The OpenLDAP License, Version 2.3.
    This is a permissive non-copyleft free software license with a few
requirements (in sections 4 and 5) that render it incompatible with the
    We urge you not to use the OpenLDAP license for software you write.
However, there is no reason to avoid running programs that have been
released under this license, such as OpenLDAP.

And by the latter that means running the server itself.  But we need to
link with the client libraries, which is the problem.

So yes, I guess I got the reason wrong, but not the basic fact. :(


On 05 Apr 2001 13:06:03 -0400, Tom Cooper wrote:
Thanks for the reply.  

I _did_ take a look at the gnu site and reviewed a number of their
documents, but 
I'm sorry to say that I still don't get it.

Which clause in their license is the "advertising" clause, and in what
way is it incompatible with the GPL?

Thanks again for your time, and a cool email application.

Tom Cooper

Not Zed wrote:

I don't see what limitations are imposed by the open ldap license
agreement which would prevent this.

I'm sorry to be so dense, but I just don't understand.  Can someone
explain this to me?

The advertising clause is incompatible with the GPL.  Unfortunate, but

Standard disclaimer applies:
This message represents the opinions of the
author, and not necessarily those of any 
organization to which he may be related.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]