[HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?

From: Arturo Tena <arturo directmail org>
To: Michael Meeks <mmeeks gnu org>
Cc: Matt Loper <matt helixcode com>, Ettore Perazzoli <ettore helixcode com>, evolution helixcode com
Subject: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:29:50 -0600

Hi!

Michael Meeks wrote:

[...]
        If I was going to choose a robust in-file filing system to store
all my vital mail in I would not automaticaly choose libole2 :-)


Agreed!!

        Possibly it is a good idea, certainly it shouldn't be too tough
though quite why it is any better than eg. tar.gz or zip format is beyond


.tar.gz and .zip are the poorest choices around. Besides, I think, 'cat > file'.


-- 
Arturo Tena
arturo directmail org

References:
- [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
  - From: Michael Meeks