RE: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
- From: Fernando Madruga <FMadruga ascoimbra pt>
- To:
- Cc: evolution helixcode com
- Subject: RE: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:21:36 +0100
GREAT! That's one of the reasons I like Outlook (not the Express
variation...): the single file to backup...
Madruga
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Loper [mailto:matt helixcode com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Março de 2000 18:08
To: 'Ettore Perazzoli'; 'Michael Meeks'
Cc: 'Arturo Tena'; evolution helixcode com
Subject: RE: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
Ettore wrote:
What about efs then?
Is it stable, fast and usable?
I think the problem with `tar.gz' and `zip' is that they are not
going to be fast. It's a real pain to update them.
agreed
But, incidentally, I must say am not very fond of this
filesystem-in-a-file idea myself. Why not just using a directory?
Localizing Evolution and Wombat related data into a file makes things easier
for a user. They can move a file from one machine to another, and they can
back up that one file onto another machine. We're going for ease of use
here; a single file for storage says "I'm your Evolution stuff", but a
directory says "I have a million files in me, and I'm complicated. Edit my
files and you'll mess everything up. Explore me and you'll get confused."
Likewise, I think although we could store some settings in (say) gconf,
those settings should be duplicated in our file -- again, so that if one
changes machines, and moves their one file, they can fire up Evolution
without problems.
I admit, putting this stuff into a file (rather than a directory) doesn't
make programmers' lives easier. But we're designing Evolution for users
first, not programmers. :)
-Matt
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]