Re: [Evolution] AUTH and BASE64
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj helixcode com>
- To: Trever Adams <trever_Adams bigfoot com>, evolution <evolution helixcode com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] AUTH and BASE64
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 13:50:36 EDT
Huh?
They will not be Base64 encoded spaces in the EHLO response, that will all
be plain text, therefor the esmtp_get_authtypes code is NOT broken
the actual AUTH tokens will be base64 encoded (possibly - according to the
RFC some may not support the base64 encoding)
Now...what *is* broken is the initial HELO vs EHLO code, we currently send
HELO if we do not detect the support of ESMTP, when, in fact, we should
probably send EHLO *first* no matter what, then, if that is rejected, send
HELO rather than trying to auto-detect
Jeff
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Trever Adams wrote:
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 13:02:28 -0400
To: evolution <evolution helixcode com>
From: Trever Adams <trever_Adams bigfoot com>
Subject: [Evolution] AUTH and BASE64
esmtp_get_authtypes is totally broken. It assumes spaces around AUTH
that won't
be there. It assumes spaces, according to the RFC, will be normal ASCII
spaces. They are BASE64 (or '='). In a few minutes I will describe the
exchange for the AUTH=LOGING type.
Trever
--
For the finest in family and value oriented products:
http://www.daysofyore.com
For owner friendly domain names: http://domains.daysofyore.com
--
Spruce: A release a day keeps the termites away
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]